Tag Archives: Allah

I REFUSE TO KNEEL

It’s some what of a misleading picture to post at the beginning of this article, given the title as personally I saw the merit and reasons why Colin Kaepernick did what he did and have a great deal of admiration for the sacrifices he made.

His refusing to stand for the national anthem in America and instead ‘taking a knee’ to show he was not taking part was as a form of protest quite brilliant in it’s simplicity, it was to peacefully dissent from the prevailing mode of behaviour to draw attention to the causes he believed in by refusing to take part in this sacred nationalistic ritual.

Even though others later joined him, he himself suffered the most abuse, including from the then President Donald Trump and was made an example of by the owners of the clubs in American Football, and his career never recovered and I understand he is close to Muslims in his life and I ask Allah to guide him to Islam and that then Allah strengthens his courage in standing up for the causes he believes to be true and guide him to the truth, ameen.

So it’s fair to say that is not the ‘taking a knee’ I am going to be discussing today but I wanted to bring all that up to show this issue of whether people take the knee or not is a fair bit more complex than both sides are suggesting.

ENTER ‘BLM

Black activism in America, and therefore by extension the rest of the anglosphere as America is the most dominant culturally and economically in the English speaking world, has always been a complicated and disparate movement or even set of movements with some shared and some different goals.

There are those who believe in steady change and those who call for radical even violent change, from those who believe the system can be reformed through to those who see themselves holding no stake in such a system and so want to burn it all down. It’s quite clear which end of that spectrum Black Lives Matter (Henceforth known in this article as BLM) fall into.

They really are revolutionary and as a former political campaigner before I came to Islam I find their abilities to mobilise their base, gain allies and go from strength to strength to be staggering.

SO WHY BE ANTI-BLM?

BLM are Marxist revolutionaries. This is no lie or exaggeration by their enemies, videos and quotes are freely available from the founders and activists within BLM but the media and their allies on progressive woke left including much of the media refuse to see or discuss this aspect of the BLM movement.

Patrisse Cullors, co-founder refers to herself and her fellow organisers as “trained marxists” and is a student of Eric Mann, former agitator of the Weather Underground US marxist domestic terror organization.

Pretty much all of the radical black and indeed non-black woke activists in the US and now in the UK are students of various forms of Critical theory, accepted and almost unopposed dogma at almost all places of higher education and among the educated elites who come through these establishments.

These various flavours of critical theory comes from postmodernist thinking, itself a product of thinkers from the Frankfurt School, made up of failed marxist revolutionaries and other leftists.

They seek to critique society, to change it radically towards a way of living they see as more just on racial and other lines and before they took much of it down from their own website BLM were quite open about their aims to dismantle the nuclear family as well as promoting homosexual and queer lifestyles into the black community which is already suffering an epidemic of family breakdown and single-parenthood.

They have marched and chanted for justice as they see it, but as well as calling for the end of Police violence (more on that in another article) they have also chanted and talked about ‘if we don’t get it, shut it down,’ or even ‘if we don’t get it, burn it down’ and this last part is definately not okay.

Hawk Newsome, president for Black Lives Matter in Greater New York was quoted by the New York Post as saying “If this country doesn’t give us what we want, then we will burn down this system and replace it. All right? And I could be speaking figuratively. I could be speaking literally. It’s a matter of interpretation.”

The internet is full of people interviewing BLM protestors, who mostly seem fine with justifying looting and rioting as legitimate forms of protest, even if they’re not taking part in that themselves.

Given this revolutionary and often violent rhetoric it’s not suprising that many of these marches have turned into riots and looting, or been followed by such.

MARXISTS – ALWAYS THE CAUSE BEFORE THE PEOPLE

When they say defund the Police they really do mean that, they have openly called for abolishing Police forces again and again, but what would happen in a community with no Police?

Well they have set-up no police zones like the ones in Seattle and Portland where the Police are literally forced out by protesters from areas of those cities. Volunteer militia’s then taking their place have murdered and committed other acts of violence as bad or worse than anything seen from police forces today.

When leftist run cities in America have taken huge amounts of money away from the police budgets in the wake of these campaigns, refused to prosecute protesters even when caught in criminal and repeated violent behaviour, refused to prosecute theft as every good Marxist knows ‘property is theft’ we’ve then seen, shock horror the crime rates have massively risen. Who would have thought that would have happened?

This is hurting most of all the poor and often ethnic minority communities in those cities, who are usually the victims of crime and are usually much less onboard with the communist / anarchist revolutionaries than their supposedly allies in the mainly white media, intellectual elite and antifa.

And not just looting and other property crimes, murder rates in such circumstances has risen as well, disproportionately affecting blacks and other minorities as victims of crime. These excess deaths are way over and above any number of unarmed police shootings, why do these black lives not matter?

IF WE DON’T GET IT, BURN IT DOWN!’

Where BLM chapters have marched, as well as their Ararcho-Communist allies – Antifa, regular ordinary people of every colour have been insulted, forced to chant revolutionary slogans and give salutes. Small businesses have been burnt down, or vandalised or exploited especially if they refuse to show ‘solidarity’ with the BLM cause.

Starbucks get’s a location vandalised or burnt down, they claim their corporate insurance, rebuild or setup another elsewhere but a small business is destroyed it will often shut down for good, their insurance usually will not cover this type of damage or if it does it will lead to massive unaffordable insurance premiums, this further destablises already damaged communities.

This is not acceptable and though 93% of BLM protests have been peaceful, that means 7% have not and these protests have been in most cities, sometimes on repeated nights, week after week with communities and police forces overstretched containing the violence and repairing the damage.

To put it simply, BLM is far less like the considered and disciplined radicalism of Fred Hampton or Malcolm X which sought to build up the black community and far more the anarchic last few crazy wild years of the Black Panthers under Huey P Newton.

Though there are tens of thousands of good decent people marching with BLM, the movement itself is so extreme in it’s outlook that it is not going to help any nation it gets it’s claws into, and it is destroying the very poor and black communities it preports to represent just like every Marxist movement has in history.

WHY WRITE ABOUT BLM, WHY NOW?

Why though as a Muslim blogger in the UK am I so concerned with BLM?

Well because what happens in America affects the rest of the world sooner or later. Britain for better or worse follow American trends and so we see stupid privileged student protesters in Britain will stand in front of unarmed British Police chanting the BLM slogan ‘hands up, don’t shoot!’

This kneeling ‘for justice’ symbolic act which has come to stand for BLM and was part of the ritual of their protests which first came to America is now sweeping the UK along with further measures. Yes others did it before them, but the two cannot now be divorced at least in the present climate.

The Labour opposition leader Sir Keir Starmer as well as many other politicians and celebrities has felt the need to have themselves pictured taking the knee specifically stating support for this Marxist revolutionary movement and it’s now the norm for sports teams to make this gesture as a collective body.

Maybe many of them agree with the message of BLM, but all of them? every time on every team, in every classroom and boardroom across the land?

Taking the knee has effectively become in the UK at this time the same as the standing for the national anthem in America, the enforced participation in a political ritual which people find themselves going along with whether they fully agree or not.

I am not saying everyone who is kneeling knows entirely what BLM is about, most I am sure are just concerned with racial justice and have been told this is how to show solidarity. But the info on BLM is out there, it’s just not being widely reported so most people do not know their background or violent rhetoric.

So given what BLM stand for, what they have done, the way they are forcing others to come onboard this is why I refuse to kneel for their agenda.

To be clear, I am a nobody, I am not a sports star, or a celebrity, so no one has asking me to kneel physically. But it’s not just politicians who are kneeling, I’ve seen friends post pictures of themselves on social media kneeling either in their living rooms, offices, or attending BLM protests.

Like most people I see over and over in the talk at work, or on emails, social media or the various forms of intranet and internet that is full of well meaning points and posts by leftist British middle class types supporting BLM or pride month or other progressive causes.

Whether it is the media, educational establishment, local government or health authorities or pretty much all big and medium sized business, they are almost all onboard with kneeling down to the BLM agenda.

I am not okay with this. I dissent.

The whole thing is bullying, bordering on the totalitarian in it’s direction of travel. I literally do mean that, there is no tolerance for dissenting opinions, whether opposed to aims or just to the method and people feel they have no choice but to shut up or even take part.

This is just like marxists behave everywhere, and it’s no accident that BLM has come out in favour of the communist Cuban regime and it’s crack down on protests and dissent in that failed state despite Cuban blacks, being the most poor, being beaten and even killed by Communist Cuban police officers as they protest their lack of rights and opportunities in that Marxist state.

IF YOU TOO DISAGREE YOU NEED TO GET OFF YOUR KNEES AND TAKE A STAND

O you who have believed, be persistently standing firm in justice, witnesses for Allah, even if it be against yourselves or parents and relatives. Whether one is rich or poor, Allah is more worthy of both.1 So follow not [personal] inclination, lest you not be just. And if you distort [your testimony] or refuse [to give it], then indeed Allah is ever, of what you do, Aware.
Quran translation, Surah An-Nisa, 4:135

It’s not sufficient in this life to keep quiet when we see people taking a wrong path and taking the rest of society along with them because that would make our own lives easier at least temporarily if we just submit or pretend to submit and go along with it.

It’s necessary to correct society where it is going astray, or else sooner or later that trouble will land on your door and in just the same why when confronted with a ritual he disliked Colin Kaepernick refused to participate so should others here with kneeling for BLM.

Though the cause is very different, it is the same peer pressure being applied to stand for the national anthem, or the minutes silence for remembering the war dead in the UK, many of whom were war criminals, or by the woke culture warriors as in the trans debate. It’s all the same to me. I won’t submit if I disagree.

It’s now got to the point where just about everyone is complying, but ask yourself why? what do they get out of it?

And if the whole of the middle classes, the business elite, the educational elite, the media lovies and celebrities are in on a cause, are you really as edgy or anti-establishment as you think or are very much part of the establishment and their aims and objectives here?

Not standing for the truth now is only going to make the situation worse and history is full of examples of the terrible messes that nations and communities got into by letting Marxists gain power over the masses.

Refusing to kneel or display a black marker on your social media profile picture, or questioning the prevailing narrative does not mean you are racist, just that you do not see BLM as having the answers to that problem of racism and causing a whole range of other problems as well.

IF NOT BLM THEN WHAT?

The BLM cause is to me, a misdirection on the path to progress on achieving justice against the steadily decreasing problems of racism faced by ethnic minorities.

I also believe that Critical Race Theory advocates are wrong and can be shown to be wrong quite clearly by reasoning, statistics and plenty of pictures of burnt out and looted shops across the US.

This argument is so clear in fact that those who say otherwise are either woefully ignorant of the facts, or misguided ideologues or else know or suspect they may be wrong and are keeping quiet out of self preservation, or else they’re grifters using the cause for their own worldly aims.

Ibram X. Kendi, widely considered one of the most important thinkers in CRT declared in an interview with Vox, “There’s only two [possible] causes of racial disparities. Either certain groups are better or worse than others … or racist policy. Those are the only two options, and antiracists believe that the racial groups are equal, and so they’re trying to change policy.”

But this is simply untrue. Yes racism is a real problem for many people but we cannot boil all differences in racial outcomes, whether in policing, or anything else as down to racism alone as it proposed by advocates of Critical Race Theory like the followers of BLM and their woke allies in the left and corporate world.

Doing so would mean we would have to pretend either there are no cultural differences between different peoples, or that these differences in cultural outlook, upbringing and faith have no impact on the outcomes that members of these groups face when carried out in the wider world.

This is not victim blaming, it’s just logic. As a casual student of history it can easily be reasoned that many of those differences exist because of often tragic historical events, but that these differences exist and will cause better or worse outcomes in different areas to different groups is pretty obvious to me.

You cannot champion and celebrate these differences as important, or mention these historical events as important in society whilst simultaneously denying their effect… Well, not and still expect to be taken seriously.

This denial of cultural differences across different groups causing different outcomes infantilises the black community, removing agency from them in pretending that all the causes for their problems are external and they can do nothing about it themselves within their own community.

To my mind it’s another slightly more subtle form of the historical patronising racism taken up by the mostly white middle classes and those who have taken on their attitudes in life to think that uniquely, the black community cannot affect change on themselves and must be saved by others, i.e the woke middle classes and their solutions.

The answer to racism is not Critical Race Theory with racial group grievances and perceived grievances but treating everyone justly as an individual, as we are taught in Islam whilst at the same time not denying them their own racial or cultural identity and this was how so much progress has been made in the west, progress which now risks being undone.

Those societies which can reach this level of justice, can both celebrate difference, whilst at the same time learning from each other to improve on and better each community. Those who do not are doomed to conflict.

“All mankind is from Adam and Eve, an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab; also a White has no superiority over a Black nor a Black has any superiority over a White except by piety and good action. Learn that every Muslim is a brother to every Muslim and that the Muslims constitute one brotherhood. Nothing shall be legitimate to a Muslim which belongs to a fellow Muslim unless it was given freely and willingly.”
Part of the final sermon from the Prophet Muhammad
(Peace and blessings of Allah be upon him)

Gotta Stop Feeding the Bear…

This may sound a bit weird, but these thoughts have been going around my head for while now, so best I write them down so I can decide if it is truly sense-making of my life, or just random drivel from a mid life man’s mind. So here we go…

You know when you’re a kid and someone will say “what is your favourite animal?” Mine was always the wolf, no question. The wolf was my beast. Yes it’s scary on a primal level but there is a savage beauty to this creation of Allah which is inspiring which I just never found in other creatures to the same degree.

I mean, I really wanted to be like the wolf from an early age. Cunning, brave, savage, capable of being cruel where necessary but never out of liking of that cruelty to other things.

But also lean, hungry, looking for that next opportunity, being mobile in my thoughts and my life pattern and even as a lucid dreamer, from about the age of ten as I learned greater control over my dreaming mind, where threatened I could if I chose to turn into some kind of wolf thing and rip any threat to pieces.

That was going to be me, that is who I wanted to be as grew into manhood, I learned to fight, I was brutal on the rugby field even if not the biggest out there, I wanted this so much in my life, my relationships, my career, so how did I end up acting and looking like a bear at 43 years old?

I am frankly mostly sedentary in my lifestyle, overweight, no obese technically though still quite active as I walk a lot… Yes I walk a lot… I don’t run, I am not fit and active as I was playing rugby as a child and young adult, I walk and walk and ponder and ponder and life just passes me by like a giant river. Occasionally I put my paw in the water and scoop out an easy to catch fish, but the vitality is gone.

All my habits, my love of food, ease and comfort has led me here to this point, where every act reinforces the next and builds on the last, as I plod through life, not so much aimlessly but certainly not how I feel I was meant to be.

Everything around me, my work, my life, my family, my community, modern easy living, it’s all forcing me down the route of the bear. That has become my pattern, as I keep doing the same things everyone now expects of me, I keep feeding the bear who is getting fatter and fatter.

Yes I can growl a bit, but the savage, lean, hungry side that I felt when young is nearly gone. Really I am just a fat old bear, living comfortably, raising a few cubs and in the depths of the night when I can’t sleep I ask where did the wolf in me go?

I feel him there in the back of the cave of my mind, starved telling me to get up and run, to work out, to strive and fight for every scrap with all the strength of my whole being but my life habits are baked in, so I do little bits here and there but this is still just feeding the bear.

I feel I have two tracks I feel I can be on, two sets of habits, two modes of being, one that I have lived for the past twenty odd years, easy going, mellow, slow to anger and slow to move or strive. The other quick and hungry, meaner and with less f’s given to the sensibilities of those around me if it gets in the way of doing what I need to do to be the absolute best beast if a man I can be with the time my Lord gives me on this earth.

So I need to stop feeding the bear.

Every habit, every thought, every scrap code reinforcing my behaviour I need to question, is this feeding the bear or the wolf in me?

We are creatures of habit, every one of us, we allow these habits to rule us, to ruin us if we let them. So every time I let an argument go, I don’t fight and take the easy route, I don’t strive, I take a day without hitting the books, or the weights, or going for a jog, or even a run, or not listening to something inciteful on a podcast, I am feeding the bear.

I can hear a low growl of the wolf now, at the back of my mind’s cave, he is getting up, stretching, pacing back and forth. There is hunger there, a darkness that is in there, a part of me which I’ve suppressed for so long I had almost forgotten. A different side longing to escape, the part of me which ran as a child and dreamed beautiful savage dreams wanting to build new habits, reinforce a new mode of living.

But first I gotta stop feeding the bear.

Yasir Qadhi refuted… by Yasir Qadhi!

This series of short slips show Yasir Qadhi ‘with the greatest of respect’ with his confessed major doubts,  his sophistry, his calls towards a western-friendly, emasculated Islam has changed over the years, how his doubts are met with a return to the Quran and Sunnah, according to the best of understanding, as he once himself followed.

May Allah reward abundently whom-so-ever put this video together, Allah guide our misguided brother Yasir Qadhi and his followers back to the truth, as well as all of us where we fall short, may Allah prevent us from falling into the fitan of liberalism, modernism, doubts and kufr we see all around us today, ameen

Saajid Lipham – Muslim Twitter, Protests, Born Muslims vs. Converts

An excellent reminder on the problems of using twitter, of protesting being the first thing on people’s minds in the current crisis and how for many Muslims, especially born Muslims in America (and I would argue the UK also) social activism is their connection to the deen and the problem with this.

He also covers the necessity of returning to Allah if we want to enact a positive change, may Allah reward the brother for his efforts, ameen.

Victim Blaming… Kinda

Assalaamu Alaykum brothers and sisters,

I saw the above image on my facebook feed and it really struck me as being totally true and the answer to so many of our problems in life, whether with others or even ourselves.

Yes, often people are stuck in terrible situations they just cannot get out of, either ones they’ve made themselves, or been trapped in by others, and in such situations sabr is the solution alongside turning to Allah in du’a and other means.

But too often, when we are looking at a problem objectively it not becomes clear there are opportunities along the way to stop the abuse, or evils taking place, to actively remove a harm but that the victim’s sabr in the face of problems actively contributed to it’s continuation or even makes things worse.

Advising sabr in such a situation as a long term ‘solution’ is not helpful, it’s absolutely harmful but it’s the first response, almost the default response from so many imams, community leaders, elders etc.

Assalaamu Alaykum,

Gingerbeardman

Love & Hate

Imām Ibn Qayyim Al-Jawziyyah (رحمه الله) said:

‘And the Religion revolves around 4 principles; i) Love, ii) Hate; and which result in either, iii) Action or iv) Abandonment.

And so whomsoever loves, hates, acts or abandons for the sake of Allāh, then they have perfected their Īmān. As in, if they love; they love for Allāh, if they hate; they hate for Allāh, if they do an action; they do it for Allāh and if they abandon something; they abandon it for Allāh.

And īmān will decrease in direct correlation to its defficieny in these 4 principles.”

Ar-Rūh “The Soul”, Publisher: Al-Maktab Al-Islāmī – page 490.

Original post taken from Good Tree Pubs – Here

On the Origins of Corporate Evil—and Idiocy

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/01/what-was-volkswagen-thinking/419127/

Commentary below by Daniel Haqiqatjou,

Very relevant to Muslim organizations, masjids, and the community overall.

Hard ethical principles are very easy to bypass and, eventually, overturn in an organization over a short period of time. How does it happen?

Well, decision-makers at the top make decisions that determine the culture that others in the organization take their cues from. If those decision-makers cut corners or make seemingly small decisions that are “necessary for practical purposes” but nonetheless contravene clear ethical principles — even principles the organization itself has adopted for itself — then this trickles down and touches everyone in the organization. A new culture is formed that justifies to itself unethical behavior and the people within the organization don’t even realize they are breaching the ethical standards that they have set for themselves.

“O you who have believed, do not follow the footsteps of Satan. And whoever follows the footsteps of Satan – indeed, he enjoins immorality and wrongdoing. And if not for the favor of Allah upon you and His mercy, not one of you would have been pure, ever, but Allah purifies whom He wills, and Allah is Hearing and Knowing.”

Muhammad Tim Humble – To Those Who Defend Taweez

All praise is due to Allah alone, and may peace and blessings be upon his Messenger, and his family and his companions.

Having read the post from Sunni Path, supporting the use of ta’weez, I think that there is a need for a clear and simple response to the issues raised.

Before delving into the points made in the article, I would like the reader to consider the following questions:

We regularly hear people defending ta’weez that contain the Qur’an and Allah’s names and attributes, but what do you think about the following:

■ Ta’weez that contain the names of shaytaan?

■ Ta’weez that contain the aayaat of Allah written backwards?

■ Ta’weez that contain symbols associated with the worship of the shaytaan, such as the so-called star of david, and the pyramids?

■ Ta’weez that contain illegible writing?

■ Ta’weez that contain pictures of the human body with words and symbols written over the top?

■ Ta’weez that contain the aayaat of Allah scribbled and not given proper respect?

Ta’weez that contain nothing except tables of numbers?

These are the vast majority of the ta’weez that we open every single week, with most of them issued by imams, scholars, and so-called ‘pious people’. Now you have to make a choice between one of two things; either you defend these ta’weez, claiming that they are actually ‘Qur’an’ or that it is permissible to disgrace the words of Allah by scribbling them, or the reader has no choice but to admit that these ta’weez are by consensus of the scholars, haraam.

I estimate that I have opened somewhere between 500 and 1,000 ta’weez in my course of being a raaqi, and at the current count, less than ten of them contained clear Qur’an or the names of Allah, with nothing else written on them. In reality, this is just another example of the magicians hiding behind respectable scholars and their opinions.

We say to the people who make these so called ta’weez from the Qur’an: would you let the sick person simply print a page of the Qur’an and tie it around his or her neck? By Allah, you would not allow it. Instead, they have to use your ‘special’ writings, which they are not allowed to see or open, and often have to pay money for. If you really hold the opinion of ‘Amr ibn al-‘Aas (may Allah be pleased with him), why don’t you allow the people to print a copy of aayat-ul-kursi from quran.com and tie it around their necks? It is the greatest aayah in the Qur’an, so why would it not protect them whilst your secret writings and scribbles can protect them? Has Allah given you something greater than aayat-ul-kursi, or is it that you seek help from the shaytaan? Where did you learn what those numbers and symbols mean? Why don’t you share your books with us that tell you how to ‘cure’ someone with pictures of the pyramids and the star of david?

My brothers and sisters, these people hide behind legitimate opinions, in order to confuse you and take you away from the path of Allah. Let me give you an example:

■ The Sunni Path post quotes those who allow ta’weez:

Sa’id ibn al-Musayyib, ‘Ata’, Mujahid, Abd Allah ibn ‘Amr, Ibn Sirin, ‘Ubayd Allah ibn Abd Allah ibn `Umar, and others (Allah be well pleased with them all). [Musannaf, 5.439]

How many of you looked at that list of people and believed them all to be from the companions? By Allah, there is only one companion mentioned in that whole list; all the rest are from the generations who came after them.

Furthermore, all of the narrations from that companion are weak. They contain Muhammad ibn Is-haaq, who is someone whose narration is not accepted unless he clearly states that he heard the hadith directly from his teacher (the Arabic term is: mudallis), which in this case he did not.

So, let me say explicitly that there is not one single companion from the companions of the Messenger of Allah (may the peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, and may Allah be pleased with them) who allowed ta’weez of any kind, whether from the Qur’an or not!

■ Let us quote the author of the Musannaf in full:

“The Chapter of those who allowed the hanging of Ta’weez”
“The permissibility of this was reported from Sa’eed ibn al-Musayyib, ‘Ataa’, Mujaahid, Abu Ja’far al-Baaqir, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Amr, Muhammad ibn Seereen, ‘Ubaydullah ibn ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar, and ad-Dahhaak and IT IS NOT AUTHENTIC from ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Amr, ad-Dahhaak, Mujaahid, and Ibn Seereen, and the rest are authentic.”

The author himself says that there is no companion who this is authentically reported from, and that half of the taabi’een mentioned are also not authentic. This is in the very same passage that the author of the post quoted – so why did he choose to stop just before the part where the author says that it isn’t authentic?

So out of that long list, we are left with ‘Ataa, Abu Ja’far, and ‘Ubaydullah – three people, none of whom were companions of the Messenger of Allah (may the peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), and even their view says that the permissibility is limited to that which is from the Qur’aan alone!

On top of that, the very same book (al-Musannaf) mentions other narrations which state that all ta’weez are haraam, even if they come from the Qur’an (authentically narrated from the companions Ibn Mas’ud, Ibn ‘Abbas, Hudhayfah, ‘Uqbah ibn ‘Aamir, and Ibn ‘Ukaym – may Allah be pleased with them all). Why didn’t the author include those narrations? Is it perhaps because he doesn’t want you to know?

Even if we accept some or all of the narrations from people who allowed ta’weez, these people are talking about writing a simple aayah of the Qur’an, or some of the names of Allah, clearly and in a way that can be understood by everyone who reads it.

Don’t be fooled by statements such as ‘the vast majority of the scholars’ and ‘it is mentioned in such-and-such a book’ – anyone can write words like these. Why don’t we talk about something quantifiable, and say ‘the vast majority of the companions, if not all of them, considered ta’weez to be haraam, in all of its forms’.

Finally, we say to the author of the Sunni Path post and his supporters: Do you know why some of the scholars allowed ta’weez from the Qur’an? Because it is the uncreated speech of Allah, and therefore cannot be considered shirk. Would you like to share with the brothers and sisters what you really believe about the Qur’an that we read, and that you claim to write on the ta’weez?

Allah knows best, and all praise is for Allah alone, and may peace and blessings be upon our messenger Muhammad, and his family and his companions.

Boycotting is the Final Treatment

Shaykh Albaani was asked:

_‘How should I deal with my neighbor who has removed her Jilbaab that she used to wear, should I boycott her?’_

Shaykh Albaani answers:

‘Boycotting a Muslim as an individual in an Islamic society is like treating a sick person with cauterization, like it has been mentioned in a proverb and in an unauthentic hadeeth: that the last treatment/cure is cauterization so boycotting is the final treatment.

It is not allowed for a Muslim man or woman to be hasty in boycotting the one who has deviated from his Islaam, rather it is upon us to follow them up, by visiting them, by reminding them about their Deen or by refuting them, perhaps they will return and repent.

If we stay with them and become despondent or we waste our time with them and become neglected and we fear this sickness will transfer to other than its source then we say salaam (farewell) to them, we do not seek the ignorant ones.

All praise belongs to Allaah Lord of the Worlds.’

[Taken from ‘Explanation of al-Adab al-Mufrad’ tape 8 side A]

Racism In Our Communities – Nick Pelletier

Assalaamu Alaykum,

Though it is addressed to the Muslims in America, every single aspect of this khutbah could be addressed to the Muslims of the UK or any other western country.

He talks about the racism in wider society, and how as Muslims living in the west we will never help fix this problem until we first address the racism in our own community, and how the racism among Muslims is worse, YES WORSE than the wider society.

We need to fix ourselves up, start setting the example for the rest of society and not keep wallowing in cultural and islamic nostalgia, may Allah swt guide us, and to to the straight path, ameen.